| 英文摘要 |
Improvements in environmental hygiene have resulted in reductions in colonization with multidrug-resistant microorganisms and healthcare-associated infections. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of practical observation using aerobic colony counts (ACC) as a gold standard comparator to verify environmental cleanliness. A prospective study was conducted at a medical intensive care unit from May 2021 to November 2022. High-touch surfaces were assessed by practical observation and aerobic colony counts. A total of 569 samples were collected. The detection rates were 47.1% for practical observation and 90.5% for ACC. The concordance rate was 54.5% (310 surfaces) between the two methods. There was a significant relationship between the results of practical observation and ACC (p < 0.01). The median ACC values were 0.00 CFU/cm2 for the“compliant”group and 0.40 CFU/cm2 for the“non-compliant”group (p < 0.01). The advantages of practical observation are its ease of operation, low cost, immediate feedback, and ability to identify gaps in education, training, and work conditions. With respect to clinical application, it is recommended that in addition to standardized observations and surveillance measures, medical facilities can use practical observation to monitor the performance of new cleaning personnel, particularly during the periods of clustered incidents or in high-risk areas, combined with other methods. |