| 英文摘要 |
Mince pies, a cherished Christmas tradition in England and Ireland since the twelfth century, have left an indelible mark on English literature, ranging from medieval recipe books to Shakespearean drama and modern popular culture. The enduring appeal of mince pies invites inquiries into their intertextual connections, sociocultural roles, and the evolving concept of values. One of the enduring myths surrounding mince pies is the alleged ban imposed by Oliver Cromwell during the mid-seventeenth century, which historical records do not substantiate. Based on the above context, this paper delves into the complex legacy of this myth by examining the contextual and textual dimensions of mince pies between 1642 and 1660. Two core questions guide this investigation: (1) What lies behind the persistent myth of“Oliver Cromwell’s mince pie ban”? (2) How was the mince pie represented and perceived in the political writings of the period? Drawing from the tradition of verbal satires, pamphlets, and mock sermons that responded to the Long Parliament (1640-1660)’s ban on Christmas celebrations, I sought to analyze the satirical texts addressing mince pies (or“Christmas pyes”) penned by Royalist and Puritan authors, especially the following three works: The Arraignment, Conviction, and Imprisoning of Christmas (1646),“The World Is Turned Upside Down”(1646), and The Exaltation of Christmas Pye (1659). By means of (inter)textual and contextual analysis, this study aspires to contribute to the scholarship of Early Modern English studies by offering in-depth and fresh perspectives on the captivating intersection of culture, literature, and history relating to food in seventeenth-century English political writings. |