| 英文摘要 |
When the market competition is fierce, products must rely on their Ad performances to gain consumers’favor. However, Ads enable consumers to get the correct information and be used for misinformation propagation. It can mislead consumers to make the wrong decisions. This study described the impact of creativity on advertising, using 21 of the Fair Trade Act to discuss whether creative advertisements violate the law. The research question of this article is whether restrictions on advertising creativity are needed to ensure fair competition between companies and protect the consumers' rights and interests. The Fair Trade Commission stipulates in Article 21 of the Fair Trade Act that companies must not transfer hypocritical or misleading information. As a result, it formulated“The 21st case processing principles”. It can be a valuable tool for judging“hypocritical”or“misleading,”but“creativity”cannot be materialized and quantified. When the effect of creative Ads becomes more critical for marketing strategy, corporate ethics, and creative advertising standards are equally important. This study uses the marketing mix 4P to explain the role and function of advertising in consumer behavior, production, and marketing processes. It then described the impact of creativity on advertising, using 21 of the Fair Trade Act to discuss whether creative advertisements violate the law. The conclusion quoted,“The Kite Theory,”finally explains that creativity is not unlimited. Especially when imagination becomes fundamental to advertising creation, it influences consumers’decisions. Therefore, it should be restricted by laws and standards for society. As a flying kite, no matter how high the kite flies, there is still a string to it. The kite string is ethics and laws. |