敦煌寫本S.2729＋ДX01366《毛詩音》作者、疑誤反切新考

New Research on the Author and Error Fan Qie（反切of Dun huang Manuscript S.2729ДX01366 Mao Shiyin（毛詩音）

敦煌寫本S.2729＋ДX01366《毛詩音》至今仍有兩個關鍵的基本問題尚未解決。首先是S.2729＋ДX01366《毛詩音》的作者問題，據唐人何超《晉書音義》解釋《詩經》有關文字時，兩引劉炫反切，可證劉炫確有毛《詩》音義類著作，此為諸家考證S.2729＋ДX01366《毛詩音》時皆未使用的新證據。以此新證據為基礎，進考宋以前音義類著作的體例，可知S.2729＋ДX01366《毛詩音》「炫以『休』、『求』韻，疑『息』當為『思』」之「炫以」，符合音義類著作中作者自下己意的規律，則潘重規等學者認為S.2729＋ДX01366《毛詩音》作者為劉炫之說，仍為目前較可信者。其次，S.2729＋ДX01366《毛詩音》中有一特殊而可疑的四字切語：「毛之六，鄭當作『屬』，朱辱反之」，前人多以「之」字衍文或存在四字反切為說，其實此乃「二重誤例」，可援據S.2729＋ДX01366《毛詩音》同類誤例，校定作「毛之六，鄭當作『屬』，屬，朱辱反」。甄定S.2729＋ДX01366《毛詩音》之作者、性質、疑誤反切等問題，也使得此一敦煌寫本除了中下層啟蒙讀物的模糊定位之外，能更深刻地被重新詮釋。

There are still two key basic issues that have not yet been resolved in the Dunhuang manuscript S.2729＋ДX01366 ''Mao Shiyin''（毛詩音）. The first is the issue of the author of ''Mao Shiyin''（毛詩音）in S.2729＋ДX01366. This article believes that the old theory that ''the author of ''Mao Shiyin''（毛詩音）in S.2729＋ДX01366 is Liu Xuan（劉炫）'' is currently more credible. Secondly, there is a special and suspicious Fan Qie（反切）in ''Mao Shiyin''（毛詩音）in S.2729＋ДX01366: '' mao zhi liu zheng dang zuo shu zhu ru fan zhi ''（毛之六，鄭當作『屬』，朱辱反之」）It should be corrected as '' maozhi liu zheng dang zuo shu shu zhu ru fan''（「毛之六，鄭當作『屬』，屬，朱辱反」）, belong to, Zhu humiliates and rebels''. Identifying the author, nature, doubts and errors of S.2729＋ДX01366 ''Mao Shiyin''（毛詩音）also enables this Dunhuang manuscript to be reinterpreted more profoundly.