| 英文摘要 |
This paper focuses on investigating whether a seafarer’s employment agreement of deepsea shipping services is a definite period agreement or indefinite agreement? The major issues discussed are: the regulations of 2006 Maritime Labour Convention (MLC); the laws of Seafarer Act or Labor Standards Act in Asian countries; the applicable situations of international shipping practices; the advantages and disadvantages of signing a definite period agreement or indefinite agreement. After conducting a comprehensive research, this study concludes as follows: (1) To protect seafarers’benefits, MLC regulates“the maximum duration of service periods on board following which a seafarer is entitled to repatriation–such periods to be less than 12 months”; (2) The“2019–2022 IBF Framework Agreement”, which is the negotiation results between ITF and shipping carriers, suggests that“the maximum period of engagement referred to in Article 5 shall be 9 months, which may be extended to 10 months or reduced to 8 months for operational convenience”. (3) Referring to collective bargaining agreements (CBA) or governmental regulations of China, Japan and Korea, it shows that seafarers working on board are all signing“definite period agreement”instead of“indefinite agreement”. The maximum service periods are 8 months (which can be extended to 10 months) according to Chinese CBA, and 8 months based on Korean regulations. The Japanese example is“6 months from the date of embarkation”or“the period fixed by a voyage”. (4) Seafarers working on board deepsea ships is defined as a“specific work”which is allowed to make a“fixed term contract”; this viewpoint has been evidenced by most domestic court decisions. |