| 英文摘要 |
The discretionary exception is an exception to the non-commercial tort exception under the FSLA. This exception provides foreign governments with another layer of protection when entire tort doctrine is being challenged fiercely. The application of the discretionary exception should meet two criteria: (1) the act or omission is discretionary in nature; (2) the act should be based on economic, social, policy and other purposes, and covered by the legislative purpose of the Congress. Nevertheless, the rule is not only highly dependent on the parallel rule under the FTCA, but also highly dependent on the opinions of administrative agencies, ledding to the instability of and the legitimacy crisis of discretionary exception. The reason is the legislative logic flaw in the FSIA infringement exception. However, the discretionary exception remains a powerful weapon protecting our country's immunity. The standard of criteria is still strictly guided by the FTCA's discretionary functional exception and following the FSIA precedents. Therefore, when responding as a defendant, we should not only utilize the discretionary exception but also pay attention to the development of the FTCA's discretionary function exception; at the same time, we should also utilize the conflict between judicial and political in the United States, such as asymmetric appeal, etc., to optimize the response strategies. In addition, the development of the discretionary exception provides guidelines for the litigations of the tort exception in Chinese immunity law. |