| 英文摘要 |
The Interpretation No. 799 of the Judicial Yuan in December 2020 involves the relevant norms for post-sentence compulsory treatment of sexual assault offenders. For the post-sentence compulsory treatment of sex offenders, the Judicial Yuan in the Interpretation No. 799 requires legal amendments and practical practice: (1)Post-sentence compulsory treatment and the execution of sentences should be clearly separated;(2)Judges should regularly review whether to extend;(3) Establish multiple treatment measures;(4)Establish supporting mechanisms or measures for social reintegration. The German Federal Constitutional Court's 4th May 2011 decision declared some provisions of the German criminal law on the Security Protective Custody to be unconstitutional, and proposed that the Security Protective Custody should meet the requirements of three principles in law and practice: (1)the principle of separation requirements; (2)the principle of external orientation; (3)the principle of therapeutic setting. Therefore, the study of the legal norms of the Security Protective Custody System in Germany and its practical practice has certain reference value for the promotion of the post-sentence compulsory treatment system for sex offenders in Taiwan. Based on this, this article discusses the historical development of the Security Protective Custody System, its practical implementation, and even the research on the recidivism. Finally, in the concluding remarks, author will put forward some suggestions on the post-sentence compulsory treatment system for sex offenders in Taiwan. |