月旦知識庫
月旦知識庫 會員登入元照網路書店月旦品評家
 
 
  1. 熱門:
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
文官制度 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
生成式AI作為司法人員決策輔助工具的可能性初探:以ChatGPT為例   全文下載 全文下載
並列篇名
A Preliminary Study of Judges and Prosecutors’Potential Use of Generative AI as a Support Tool in Decision Making: The Case of ChatGPT
作者 張巧函
中文摘要
本文探討生成式AI作為輔助工具應用於司法人員決策過程的可能性,採用文獻回顧及深度訪談法進行研究。首先基於文獻回顧,綜合生成式AI的資料處理流程、司法人員決策影響因素等,提出了以司法人員為主體的研究概念架構,以深度訪談法詢問2位檢察官及3位法官,並由受訪者與ChatGPT就法律問題進行直接互動,研究者再綜合訪談結果進行編碼,就前開概念架構進行理論對話及修正。結果顯示,在組織慣例及個人經驗需求上,司法機關具備有利於導入生成式AI的條件,但司法人員在行使裁量權及作成自由心證的過程中,也可能限制生成式AI的可應用性。最後,本文在理論貢獻方面,提出了生成式AI輔助司法人員決策過程的概念架構;在實務建議方面,提出司法機關導入生成式AI前,應優先處理技術性及自動化偏見問題,並制定審查監督機制,建立具透明性、可被課責的生成式AI,輔助司法人員提升決策效率及品質。
英文摘要
This article explores the potential of generative AI as an auxiliary tool in the judicial decision-making process. It employed a literature review and indepth interviews as research methods. Based on the literature review, this article proposed a human-centered research framework that integrates aspects such as the data processing flow of generative AI and factors influencing judicial decisions. Through in-depth interviews with 2 prosecutors and 3 judges, participants interacted directly with ChatGPT on legal issues. Interview results were coded, and theoretical dialogue and refinement were performed using the conceptual framework. Findings indicate that judicial institutions favor the introduction of generative AI, particularly concerning organizational habits and personal experience limitations. However, the discretion power of prosecutors and understanding of the principle of“free proof”by judges may limit the applicability of generative AI. Finally, this article makes a theoretical contribution by proposing a conceptual framework for integrating generative AI into the judicial decision-making process. In practical suggestions, it is proposed that before adopting generative AI, judicial institutions should prioritize addressing technical and automation biases in generative AI, establish audit and review mechanisms, and develop transparent and accountable generative AI systems that can assist prosecutors and judges in improving the efficiency and quality of decision-making.
起訖頁 97-137
關鍵詞 生成式AI決策過程裁量偏見課責generative AIdecision processdiscretionbiasaccountability
刊名 文官制度  
期數 202411 (16:2期)
出版單位 考試院
該期刊-上一篇 我國資安行政法人被終結的個案研究:斷續均衡理論的修正與應用
該期刊-下一篇 人工智慧於地方政府中的應用可能
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄