明修棧道，暗渡陳倉：男色小說〈潘文子契合鴛鴦冢〉的敘事策略與性別政治

Narrative Strategies and Gender Politics in Ming Dynasty’s Male Erotic Novel

晚明開始出現專以男色風氣為題材的小說，構成了一個男色文學書寫系譜。本文所探討的《石點頭》全書雖非專以男色為題，但第14卷〈潘文子契合鴛鴦冢〉（以下簡稱〈潘文子〉）卻是男色小說中的佼佼者，但在不同的版本中，〈潘文子〉有時被全面或部分刪削，顯示此類男色書寫為當局或編者所忌憚。為何隸屬於私領域的同性性行為與情欲傾向，被主流如此嚴陣以待？其中是否暗藏了破壞的潛能與因子？而在這些異端的書寫中，道德規範如何發生作用、干擾敘事的進行？異端書寫與傳統論述間如何相抗又相諧的在文本中交織、對話？在這樣的故事與敘事模式裡，醞釀出怎樣的性別視野與文化景觀？本文從〈潘文子〉的敘事策略切入，分析其敘事結構與內涵間的矛盾與協商，探討其中隱含豐富與多樣的性別政治，藉此探討小說形式與內涵間的關係，小說之套語、散文與大、小傳統間的對應關係，提出新的詮釋模式。正文將以幾節討論：
一、明貶暗褒：男色禁忌主題的敘事策略
二、無言的結局，有情的餘韻：大傳統與小傳統的糾結、矛盾與和諧
三、男色之美與男性之眼：小說中的性別意涵與明末男風現象的反思
四、結論：套語、正話與大、小傳統之關係與接收模式

In the late Ming Dynasty, novels focusing on male eroticism began to emerge, forming a genealogy of male erotic literature. Although the whole novel“ShidianTou”discussed in this article is not exclusively about male eroticism, the fourteenth chapter ''Pan Wenzi Qihe Yuanyang Zhong'' (hereinafter as ''Pan Wenzi'') is the epitome of male erotic writings. But in different versions of the novel, ''Pan Wenzi'' was sometimes completely or partially deleted, indicating that this type of male erotic writing was feared by authorities or editors.
Why are same-sex sexual behaviors and erotic tendencies, which belong to the private sphere, so closely censored by the mainstream? Are there any insidious destructive potentials and factors? And in these heretical writings, how do moral norms play a role and interfere with the progress of narration? How do heretical writings and traditional discourses not only compete with but also harmoniously intertwine with each other in the text? What kind of gender visions and cultural landscapes are brewing in such stories and narrative modes? This article starts from the narrative strategy of ''Pan Wenzi'', analyzes the contradictions and negotiations between its narrative structures and connotations, and explores the rich and diverse gender politics hidden. It also reflects on the discussion of masculinity research in the late Ming Dynasty, which used as a means to explore the form of story-telling novels. It proposes a new interpretation model for the correspondence between novel formulas, prose, and major and minor traditions.