義旨淵微，非註不顯──清代《近思錄》注本的嬗遞考察

The Deep Meaning Can Only Be Expressed Through Annotations: An Investigation into the Evolution of Annotation on Reflections on Things at Hand (Jin Si Lu) During the Qing Dynasty

本文考察清代《近思錄》注本，藉由各家注文的比較，尋繹嬗遞情形，由此顯示清代理學變化之縮影。按時序，清初《近思錄》注家們有意糾舉明代擅改編排的粗疏注本，懷有道統傳承使命，注文以自身闡釋為主；其後開始走向裒集朱熹論說，並「附己意於其間」，隱然勾勒出一程朱學說承續者的初步圖像；同一時期另有注家運用校勘、訓詁的方式進行註解。至乾嘉時期進一步將考據學「以經注經」的治學模式充分運用於其中，即所謂「輯朱子之語，以注朱子之書」，展現考據學風對程朱理學深化的影響。晚清則就上述注本進行增補，甚至摘錄陸九淵語錄，昭示了晚清注家對於朱陸門戶的見解；另也引錄部分未見於記載的文獻，不僅在取材上有其意義，亦可見當時思想家有意別開蹊徑的態度。

This paper examines the annotated editions of Jin Si Lu (《近思錄》) during the Qing Dynasty, highlighting the evolution of Neo-Confucian thought. Early Qing scholars aimed to correct the loose annotations and editorial changes from the Ming Dynasty, emphasizing orthodoxy while integrating personal interpretations. Gradually, annotations incorporated Zhu Xi’s theories, shaping his intellectual legacy. In the Qianjia period, the approach of“commenting on classics with classics”gained prominence, deepening Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianism through systematic annotation. Late Qing scholars expanded on earlier works, citing previously unrecorded texts and occasionally referencing Lu Jiu Yuan to reflect nuanced views on the Zhu-Lu lineage. These annotations combined traditional scholarship with innovative methods, such as textual criticism and philology, showcasing the dynamic interplay between preserving orthodoxy and embracing new intellectual approaches in Qing thought.