| 英文摘要 |
Previous literature assessing inhibition deficits in patients undergoing methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) using the Go/No-Go task has overlooked the unbalanced design in which participants learn behavioral inhibition and behavioral approach. This study aims to examine the extent of behavioral deficits in patients undergoing MMT when response (go/nogo response) and valence (reward for correct response/punishment for incorrect response) are orthogonalized in the modified Go/No-Go task. Fifty former heroin misusers were recruited from a city hospital, along with 30 male controls, and were assessed using Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices, Beck Depression Inventory-II, Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the modified Go/No-Go task. Cognitive modeling was conducted to investigate the underlying processes. The results showed that patients undergoing MMT had significantly higher error rates in the nogo-to-win trials than in the go-to-win trials, while there was no significant difference in the control group. The learning rate in nogo-to-win trials of patients undergoing MMT was not only slower than that in controls but also slower than patients’undergoing MMT own learning rate in go-to-win trials. The findings suggest that the patients undergoing MMT showed an inhibition deficit, which might be relevant to a poorer learning rate for behavioral inhibition. |