| 英文摘要 |
Past research on Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan standing committees has found that the influence of committees is limited. This is based on two main reasons: one is that the second reading after the committee often overturns the committee’s review results; the other is that the party negotiation conducted after the committee dominates the outcome of legislation. However, due to the substantial increase in legislative proposals and the revision of the party negotiation mechanism since the second wave of congressional reforms to strengthen the committee's functions, it is necessary to re-examine the legislative role of the committee in the legislative process. When examining a stage of the legislative process on the legislative outcome, political scientists are used to selecting one or two legislative stages and evaluate their effects on the legislative outcome. However, this approach introduces bias by (i) ignoring that legislation itself is a multi-stage dynamic process, and only capturing some stages is likely to ignore the effects of previous and subsequent legislative stages on the legislative outcome, and (ii) excluding the heterogeneous effect from an independent variable between different stages. Therefore, this study uses a sequential logit model to examine whether bills can pass through different legislative stages and finally reach the result of successful legislation, so as to evaluate the role of the standing committees in the legislative process. This research takes all the bills that passed the first reading in the 8th and 9th Legislative Yuan and finds that the standing committees have a very important agenda-setting influence on the final success of bills. |