| 英文摘要 |
This article presents an exploratory analysis of legislators’written parliamentary questions (WPQs) in Taiwan, examining the impact of electoral reform on representative behavior. The shift from a single non-transferable vote (SNTV) in multi-member districts (MMDs) to single-member districts (SMDs) particularly affects regional legislators. I argue that the lower electoral threshold under MMDs incentivized these legislators to prioritize particularistic interests. However, after electoral reform, under the SMDs, the need to appeal to a broader voter base has shifted their focus towards more general public interests and issues spanning wider geographic scopes. The study analyzes WPQs, which have been overlooked in previous research in Taiwan. The study categorizes WPQ content into three interest types (particularistic, general, and non-distributive) and five geographic scopes (local, cross-regional, national, cross-strait relations, and international relations). Findings reveal that regional legislators, in both the fifth and seventh terms, demonstrate a stronger inclination towards particularistic interests compared to their proportional representation (PR) counterparts. However, in the seventh term, there is a notable increase in their attention to general interests. Additionally, while these legislators predominantly focus on local issues, there is an observed expansion in their engagement with cross-regional and national matters in the seventh term. This shift suggests a transition from being predominantly“regional representatives”to“catch-all representatives”in the post-electoral reform era, reflecting a broader concern for general interests and a wider range of issues in their WPQs. |