跟騷法實施成果分析與法制檢討

本文試圖透過官方的統計資料與學說、實務的見解，觀察並分析在跟蹤騷擾防制法在2022年6月1日正式施行後，防制跟蹤騷擾行為之效果與其問題。並提出個人的看法。在分析後，本文認為書面告誡雖然有其效果，但仍然必須想辦法解決書面告誡與保護令之間的保護空窗期，而保護令的效果部分亦有賴各機關之間的合作。而在跟蹤騷擾罪的討論中，本文對於把性或性別做最廣義解釋的實務見解抱持疑問，並嘗試對於跟蹤騷擾罪之法益，提出個人的看法。

This Article attempts to observe and analyze the effects of preventing stalking behavior and its problems after the Stalking and Harassment Prevention Act comes into force on June 1, 2022, through official statistics and academic and practical views. After analyzing those data, this Article clarifies that although the written warning has its effect, it is still necessary to find a way to solve the problem of Unprotected periods between the written warning and the Restraining Order, and the effect of the Restraining Order partly relies on the cooperation of government agencies. In the discussion of the offence of stalking, this article is skeptical of the practical view that sex or gender should be interpreted in the broadest sense, and attempts to provide a personal view on the legal benefits of the offence of stalking.