| 英文摘要 |
Recently, the pricing method of condominium housing in Taiwan is based on the price includes private part combined shared area(the area of neighborhood facilities)of the building. In contrast, both Hong Kong and Japan are priced only private part of the building. In terms of utility theory, neighborhood facilities also bring benefits, however, it is commonly believed that the private part of the building is much more effective, consequently, the argument of pricing only private part of building has appeared. On the other hand, Taiwan’s government is looking for a method to separate the price of private area and the area of neighborhood facilities in order to improve the information of housing price, although the technique has not yet been determined. Tse & Love (2000) showed that neighborhood facilities are the factors affecting housing prices, but how can the pricing of neighborhood facilities reflects utility practically? To answer the question, this study wants to analyze different pricing methods in order to clarify the true value of neighborhood facilities. This study used WLS as model, and selected the sale price of real estate in 19th condominium housing in a specific area of Taipei University, from 2012 to 2017, totally 1,159 data. The study found that neighborhood facilities have positive impact on housing prices, while recent pricing method overestimates neighborhood facilities prices, the pricing methods which priced only private part of the building will underestimate neighborhood facilities prices. On the contrary, the pricing method separating the private area and the area of neighborhood facilities found that neighborhood facilities only account for nearly 30% of the price of the private area. Supposed that housing price will decline when the price is based on the ratio, moreover, the ratio can be used not only as a reference for government to separate the price of private area and the area of neighborhood facilities in the future, improve the information of housing price, but also solve the dispute under recent pricing method. |