公務員迴避義務及其範圍之探討   全文下載

The Analysis on the Ambit and Obligation of Recusal of the Public Servants

在我國法律體系中，有關迴避義務之規範，散見於各類法律和行政命令之中。該等法律和命令對於迴避義務之規範，內容寬嚴不一，迴避範圍之大小，亦不一致。目前並無一項判準可提供對這些法律和命令所規範之迴避範圍之法規範之妥適性、正當性、合理性與合目的性作一衡判標準。為探求該項基準，本文嘗試從法哲學之面向以及從現行法律中對於迴避義務之規範加以分析整理，以期歸納出此種共通之判準。關於公務員迴避義務其範圍之探討，本文首先就迴避義務在法哲學上之思維先予分析討論，並以JohnRawls的正義理論之基本理念來證立迴避義務。繼之，就迴避之作用之實際內涵，分別從實體法與程序法之規範予以分析探究，再者，就迴避範圍予以分析討論，以探求出迴避範圍之基準和迴避範圍之基本範疇，並利用該等探求所得之結果：基準，就現行某些法律之迴避規範加以檢視分析及檢討，同時將檢討之結果，提出修法之建議，讓我國迴避制度之建立更能契合理論以及實務上之實際需求。

The contents of recusal of the public servants are stipulated scattered on variety of law and administrative decree under the current legal system. There are no uniform standard to review the contents of recusal which are based on appropriate, legitimacy, purpose, and reasonable under those clauses. This contribution will advance the proposition that the duties of recusal will be clarified from the perspective of philosophy and law. First, a philosophy of law-grounded analytic framework is employed in this article which draws from John Rawls’s theories of justice. Second, the practical meaning of function of recusal will be explained from substantive law and procedural law. Moreover, the ambit of recusal will be discussed in this article to seek the basic principles and standard of recusal of the public servants. Likewise, Conclusion and suggestion will be refereed to revise the current legislation and to fit for demands of the practice.