月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
文官制度 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
管理才能評鑑途徑的爭議與展望:以「籃中演練」為例   全文下載 全文下載
並列篇名
Invited Essay―Debate on Assessment Center Approaches and Its Solutions: A Case of In-Basket Exercise
作者 黃一峯
英文摘要
The assessment center has been widely used in European and American countries as an assessment mechanism for assessing management expertise, and it has received attention in Taiwan in recent years. Since 1980s, there has long been a debate between supporters of two approaches -- task-based assessment center (TBAC) and dimension-based assessment center (DBAC). The former advocates that the job tasks of the ''target position'' should be used as the criteria for training and assessment; the latter emphasizes that the common ability (dimension) criteria can be applied to all managerial positions regardless of professional demands. However, according to the competency model theory, full competency means the ability to achieve both task and dimension. This article discusses the focus of this controversy, explore the feasibility of the task-based approach through implementing in-basket exercise. This article designs a task-based in-basket for police station chiefs. It includes 31 situations to assess ten task behaviors, and invites trainees from the Central Police University as subjects. The statistical results indicate that gender, class, age, and educational background have some significant differences in task performance. The author also makes suggestions for the future application and research of the in-basket exercise.
起訖頁 35-55
關鍵詞 任務基礎評鑑中心向度基礎評鑑中心籃中演練task-based assessment center (TBAC)dimension-based assessment center (DBAC)in-basket exercise
刊名 文官制度  
期數 202004 (12:2期)
出版單位 考試院
該期刊-上一篇 從「社會企業」到「社會創新」之政策變遷分析:多元流程模型的觀點
該期刊-下一篇 公共服務動機析論:兼論後年改時代提升公共服務動機之策略
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄