| 英文摘要 |
The match between Alpha Go and Ke Jie ended with three defeats for Ke Jie in 2017. The incident ignited a deep concern and discussion on the issue of the relationship between ＂human and artificial intelligence＂ for the Chinese public, and it was presented in China's online public opinion field. Using the method of discourse analysis, this research aims to explain the following questions with nested logic, through the analysis of different media voices and the text of online public opinion in the case of Alpha Go against Ke Jie: 1. Explore the different discourse strategies on the relationship between ＂human and artificial intelligence＂ presented by different media in the reports of ＂Alpha Go versus Ke Jie＂ event; 2. Clarify the subjects behind different ＂relationship＂ statements, and analyze the core of different ＂relationship＂ issues: the boundary between human and artificial intelligence; 3. Reveal the ＂truth wandering＂ from four different aspects in the news reports and public opinions caused by this incident. This paper pays special attention to the political and economic structure that causes the ＂truth wandering＂, that is, to see the truth through political and economic criticism. The complex public opinion caused by the match between Alpha Go and Ke Jie, and the breakage of the position, cognition and consensus on the boundary between ＂human and artificial intelligence＂ caused by the diversification of technological subjects in China during the transition period it represents, and these are precisely the typical symptoms of ＂post-truth＂. |
本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
