英文摘要 |
The speeding urbanization has resulted in a decline in the population of remote areas year by year, which has caused bus routes, retail stores, and daily service facilities in these areas to be unable to sustain operation and thus choose to retreat from remote areas. Under the circumstances, remote areas have become the areas without public transportation services and even food deserts with low life quality, making residents in remote areas become the transportation and consumer disadvantaged. Living environment problems that the residents in remote areas face are both complex and confounding, so if we propose the countermeasures only based on a single aspect, it will only cure the symptoms, not the root of the disease. Therefore, it is necessary to rethink how to put forward a more flexible and resilient approach from interdisciplinary integration to generate broader synergies and strive toward solving fundamental problems. This study believes that concepts such as“transportation,”“circulation (logistics and distribution),”and“information and communication”should be taken into consideration simultaneously to propose appropriate strategies for“city-remote area cooperation”in the context of increasingly advanced technology. Thus, we can solve the problems encountered by the residents in remote areas regarding transportation, industry, and living environment by the abovementioned strategies. It is a crucial action to promote the gradual implementation of the placemaking concept in the remote areas. Therefore, we have first reviewed and synthesized the features of domestic and foreign theories and related cases in consideration of the environment and living habits of residents in the remote areas of Taiwan. Then, we attempt to propose the crucial concept of“Demand Responsive Service Place”with the features of“public-private cooperation,”“multi-functionalization and commonality,”“demand response,”and“information and communication technology introduction”from the standpoint of cross-resources integration for improving the living environment in the remote areas. Although this concept may still be ill-conceived in planning practice, the new idea can restart the planners’new thinking. |