英文摘要 |
In efforts to foster national unity, the Lao government has implemented a policy of Laoization in language and ethnic identity, aiming for linguistic and cultural homogeneity. However, since the Lao people only account for more than half of the total population, the Laoization policy cannot avoid suppressing the minority groups. In addition to the policy of Laoiaztion and nation building, this article identifies a long-standing ethnic trichotomy in Lao society based on altitude: Lowland Lao, Highland Lao, and Upland Lao. While this classification is based on elevation, it implicitly reflects urban-rural disparities, differences in civilization, and issues of ethnic hierarchy. The Lowland Lao, predominantly the Lao people, inhabit the river valleys, traditionally engaging in rice cultivation, practicing Buddhism, and speaking Lao, and are considered the core of civilization, prosperity, and progress. In contrast, the Highland and Upland Lao residing in higher-altitude mountainous regions have traditionally lived a poor and backward nomadic lifestyle of slash-and-burn farming, believe in animism, speak their respective ethnic languages, and are perceived as being at the periphery of civilization and politics. Beyond ethnic hierarchy, the article also explores the historical tensions between the Lao Communist government and the Hmong, as well as the complex relationship between Laos and Thailand. Finally, the paper attempts to construct a theoretical framework of ethnic hierarchy based on Laos' ethnic politics. |