月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
中正漢學研究 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
「王霸之辨」在《春秋》解經中的運用與反省-以朱熹及張洽的觀點為核心
並列篇名
The usage and introspection of ''Distinction between the Kingly Way and the Hegemonic Way'' in explaning Chun-Qiu which in the view of Xi Zhu and Zhang Qia
作者 劉德明
中文摘要
「王霸之辨」在宋代儒學是個重要的議題,學者通常將討論的重心放在朱子與陳亮的相關辯論上。本文試圖由另一個方向來觀察、反省「王霸之辨」的理論與實踐的問題。在歷史上,「王/霸」成為一組相對概念是由孟子所提出,其所謂的「王」,在歷史現實中指湯與周文王,而「霸」則指「五霸」,特別是「齊桓為盛」。而在五經之中,《春秋》一書對於「霸」的記錄則是最為豐富的,孟子亦言:「其事則齊桓、晉文。」所以本文透過朱熹與其學生張洽對於「王/霸」相關論述,用以觀察「王霸之辨」是如何運用在《春秋》中,並由中反省其可能產生的困難及問題。本文結論有三個重點:一、王霸之辨是基於義、利存心的不同,就理論而言雖是明確的區分,但落實在評價歷史人物行為時,有時並不容易有清楚的論斷。二、儒者常以動心起念之際來區辨王霸,但在評說歷史人物時,若加上考慮其現實的處境與困境後,對其評價可能會有所不同。三、朱子由明辨王霸之別因而不願多言「霸術」,無形中排斥了詳細理解《春秋》的可能性。張洽的《春秋》學正可以證明,對霸術的說解與堅持王霸之辨兩者並不直接衝突。《春秋》做為儒家外王學的重要經典,正因其間有許多爭霸史事,正足以成為後世儒者的教誡。
英文摘要
'Distinction between the Kingly Way and the Hegemonic Way'' is an important issue in Confucian School in Song Dynasty , and the researchers usually put their point in the debate Xi Zhu and Chen Liang. This article attempt to observe the theory and practice about ''Distinction between the Kingly Way and the Hegemonic Way''. The distinction between The kingly way and Hegemonic Way is first set froth by Mencius. The king of Mencius's theory means Shang Tang and king of Zhou wen-wang, and the hegemony means duke huan of qi huan-kung. The record of hegemony is most abundant in Chun-Qiu. So in this article, I observed and contrasted how '' Distinction between the Kingly Way and the Hegemonic Way'' is used in Chun-Qiu and introspect the difficulties about it by Xi Zhu and Zhang Qia's description about ''Distinction between the Kingly Way and the Hegemonic Way''. There are three points in this article. First , ''Distinction between the Kingly Way and the Hegemonic Way'' is different from ''Distinction between Justice and profit''. It has distinction in theory, but when evaluating the ancients, it is not easy to have a clear inference. Second, In Confucian School usually distinguish '' the Kingly Way and the Hegemonic Way'' by motivation, but when evaluating the acients , the crticism will different because of the real world. Third, because of '' Distinction between the Kingly Way and the Hegemonic Way'', Xi Zhu didn't on Hegemonic Way and Chun-Qiu. However, Zhang Qia's studies of Chun-Qiu can prove that there is no conflict between Hegemonic Way and ''Distinction between the Kingly Way and the Hegemonic Way''. In addition ,because of the history in Chun-Qiu can be a lesson to the Confucian School nowadays.
起訖頁 117-141
關鍵詞 王霸之辨義利之辨朱熹張洽春秋Distinction between the Kingly Way and the Hegemonic WayDistinction between Justice and profitXi ZhuZhang QiaChun-Qiu
刊名 中正漢學研究  
期數 201606 (27期)
出版單位 國立中正大學中國文學系
該期刊-上一篇 朝鮮儒者田艮齋對朱子思想的理解--比較牟宗三先生的說法
該期刊-下一篇 朱子的孟學詮釋特徵
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄