英文摘要 |
From the perspective of institutional practice, the extraterritorial effect of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has formed a relatively effective regulation on large enterprises outside the EU, and led the relevant legislative trend of the international community. It is a relatively successful sample in the extraterritorial application of domestic law in recent years. The extraterritorial effect of GDPR is based on the market and values, and is implemented through the high-level application of legal tools under the framework of international law. As far as legislation is concerned, GDPR is very careful to seek the reasonable boundary of jurisdiction between the expansion and limitation of extraterritorial effect, striving to establish the legitimacy of jurisdiction. In terms of law enforcement, considering the feasibility of extraterritorial law enforcement, the EU has promoted the implementation of GDPR' s extraterritorial effect through various domestic and bilateral mechanisms and arrangements. In the face of possible head-on legal conflicts and obstacles arising from extraterritorial law enforcement, the EU has also been flexible, pragmatic and had some compromises. China's Personal Information Protection Law has followed the ''target subject'' standard of GDPR for extraterritorial effect legislation. The current focus is to build an effective law enforcement framework as soon as possible. We should learn from the relevant experience of the EU and combine the actual situation of our country to make the system design of law enforcement measures, clarify the idea of law enforcement, and gradually establish the mechanism of cross-border law enforcement cooperation, so as to provide strong support for the implementation of the extraterritorial effect of Personal Information Protection Law. |