英文摘要 |
There is a distinction between the theory of criminal constitution and the norms of criminal constitution. The theory of criminal constitution is only a methodological theoretical system for criminalization, not a normative system for the evaluation of the establishment of crime and a normative basis for the application of criminalization. The norms of criminal composition, as the normative system used for the evaluation of the establishment of a crime and the normative basis for the conviction of a crime, can only be a localized normative construction based on the criminal law of the country. This normative construction should be equivalent to the evaluation system of the establishment of the crime, but in our country, because it is limited to the four elements of the system and is only an essential part of the evaluation system of the establishment of the crime. The complete structure of the evaluation system for the establishment of a crime in China should be a normative system constructed on the basis of the three basic features of the definition of a crime in Article 13 of the Criminal Law of the Peoples Republic of China, including criminal law norms on serious social harm as a threshold for the commission of a crime, criminal illegality as a normative system of the four elements, and punishability as a threshold for the punishment of a crime. In order to focus the criminal establishment evaluation system on the essence of the crime, such localized normative construction must be built on the basis of the essential features of the crime. The localized practical application of the normative evaluation system for the establishment of a crime must be based on the construction of a multi-dimensional conviction method for the determination of a hierarchical crime. |