英文摘要 |
The new mechanical philosophy has been developing many important guiding strategies for biological discovery, one of which is modular subassembly. It explicates how biologists use a given and available mechanistic schemata from the background knowledge to design and evaluate experimental data. Under this framework, the mechanistic module is the starting point of biological research, but what will biologists do if there is no available module at first? This paper presents a case study involving exploratory experimentation. This case study will show that traditional and new-mechanistic framework overly focuses on analyzing experiments as the tool serving a particular theory or mechanistic model. As a consequence, it pays less attention to the parts of exploration and experimental data used by biologists. By reconstructing their modeling process, I will present the exploratory character of the practice and argue that the biologists mostly use exploratory practice to push the modeling process. I carefully examine the process of biologists arranging, presenting and constructing new mechanism models, and explore the rationality of exploration and mechanism reasoning. This process is better because, on the one hand, it reveals that the data modules obtained from exploration experiments can be used as the composition of constructing new mechanism models; on the other hand, the complete new mechanism philosophy does not see the discovery strategies arising from experimental exploration. |