英文摘要 |
The present article adopts“dual attestation”and uses literature on mathematics and divination to discuss the key concept of the“eight assemblies”八會of ancient kanyu堪輿(“heaven and earth”or“geomancy”) by combining ancient documents, both passed down and newly excavated, and unearthed objects. Through a detailed comparison, this article discovers that the system of the eight assemblies recorded therein is divided into two categories: one is mainly found in the Rites of Zhou周禮and Huainanzi淮南子, whereas the second is recorded in the surviving text of Kanyu jing堪輿經. The differences between the two forms is outwardly the difference in the month of the“great assembly”大會, but in reality, it is due to the dissimilarity in the method of calculating the assembly day, a“difference”caused by the misunderstanding of previous commentaries. We have found the second system of the eight assemblies in Kanyu jing堪輿經to be more credible, in part, as it is supplemented by relevant records in the chapter Kanyu堪輿of the Peking University Western Han bamboo slips. In addition, we point out that the unique right-line twelve branches diagrams used by kanyu practitioners are related to the special importance they attached to the eight assemblies, evidenced by excavated documents and objects. This investigation into the matter not only provides us with an in-depth understanding of the specific connotations of the eight assemblies and its development and evolution processes, but also allows us to fully appreciate the remarkable complexity and rigorous logic of mathematical and divination literature. |