明清之際，遺民說經：賀貽孫《詩經觸義》評析

Between the Ming and Qing Dynasties, how does interpret the Classics by loyalist：The Critique of Heh Yie Suen’s (賀貽孫) “ Solution of Shi Jiang ” 《詩經觸義》

明清學術有顯著差異，而明、清之際《詩》學樣貌為何？明遺民如何連接二代《詩》學史的環節？限於筆力與篇幅，選定賀貽孫《詩經觸義》，提供線索。貽孫遁入山林，堅不出仕，晚年更逃名自匿。《四庫全書總目》毀譽參半，提供反思與討論空間。從《詩》學史角度切入，評述《詩》主張、內容及方法，呈現此一「鼎革」時代氛圍，對遺民《詩》論產生之影響。貽孫兼采漢宋，折中諸說，對朱《傳》亦多批評。其次，又表現關懷天下卻獨善其身的生命哲理，顯示強烈詮經特色。再者，以多元文學手法解詩，並將《詩》與後代詩文書畫等藝術會通比較，相當罕見，最後評騭缺失。研析《詩經觸義》有助增補明清之際的《詩》學概況，盼引後人興趣，逐步解決諸般疑問。

The academy of the Ming and Qing Dynasties shows differences, and, what kind of lookses about '' the Book of Songs” is presented between Ming-Qing transition. Loyalist live through the change of dynasty, how to connect intermediate link of the academic history of '' the Book of Songs”.Take a broad view of '' catalogue of Si Ku Quan Shu ''(《四庫全書總 目》),“ Solution of Shi Jiang ” was as much praised as blamed., offer a lot of thinking space. I discuss the text from a angle of the academic history of '' the Book of Songs”, comment stands, content and methods, try to find influence of the times. Heh Yie Suen is the leftover person in the Ming Dynasty, refusing the Qing Dynasty of Government’s recruitment . Heh Yie Suen’s Works numerous, “Solution of Shi Jiang”represent study theory about '' the Book of Songs”. It’s eclecticism, besides, criticize to Zhu Xi (朱熹). Secondly, displaying his philosophic theory thought from it, and showing personal feature of the classics interpretation. Moreover, solve poem with literature, to touch on a lot of the devices, comparing with '' the Book of Songs”, ''The Songs of the South ”(楚辭), poetry, prose and pictures. This phenomenon is quite rare. This text comments on the mistake finally. Even so, it contributed to subjoin the general situation of '' the Book of Songs” academic research between Ming-Qing transition, and revealing its position , in order to solve me about all sorts of the above-mentioned queries.