英文摘要 |
Among the over three hundred thousand documents in the archives of the Grand Secretariat of the Ming and Qing imperial governments preserved at the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, is a hitherto unexamined document titled Xiangyue duo shu (Textbook on the Community Covenant, hereafter XYDS), which was initially presented by Zhai Fengzhu (1608–1668), a vice circuit intendant in Jiangxi, to the Shunzhi Emperor. The discovery of XYDS sheds light on the promotion of the community covenant and mass education in the Ming and Qing dynasties, and allows historians to explore in rare detail such topics as the reconstruction of order in early Qing society, the functioning of the community covenant following the proclamation of the Shunzhi Emperor’s “Six Edicts” (1652), and both continuities and changes in mass education during the Ming-Qing transition. XYDS not only reflects Zhai’s personal ideals regarding the community covenant, but considering he implemented those ideals during the course of his official career, XYDS is invaluable evidence that elucidates local mass education during the period of time in question. XYDS offers a line-for-line explication of the “Six Edicts” promulgated by Shunzhi. It is divided into three major sections: the first explains the motivations and meanings behind the edicts; the second cites legal provisions regarding penalties for related offenses; and the third concludes with rhymed didactic ballads and poems. In comparing and examining relevant materials, this article analyzes the strategies employed by XYDS in interpreting the sacred edicts. More specifically, it investigates how popular stories and folklore are integrated to illuminate the teachings of the imperial edicts, how legal articles are chosen and cited in further support of imperial law as both punishing vice and rewarding virtue, and how poetry is used as a vehicle to convey the creeds in a form that can be easily memorized. It is generally held that Fan Hong’s Liuyu yanyi (Elaboration on the Six Edicts), passing through Ryukyu, was transmitted to Japan and influenced the formation of the commoners’ education during the late Tokugawa period. Through detailed comparison and contrast, we find that it bore strong resemblance to XYDS in terms of content and format. Most significantly, Fan Hong’s postscript stating his mission evidently plagiarized Zhai Fengzhu’s preface without any acknowledgement. Thus, in a way, the education of Tokugawa Japan actually benefited from the uncredited influence of XYDS. While promoting XYDS, Zhai constantly claims that lecturing on the covenant (jiang yue) is equivalent to lecturing on Confucian thought (jiang xue) and upholds the notion that “the learning of the sages” is “the learning of the people.” This position is clearly aligned with the “cultural turn” of Neo-Confucianism, namely its orientation towards popular audiences, which was evident from the mid-Ming period. Following the formation of the sacred edicts and the community covenant into an organic whole, the “Six Edicts” became the hinge point linking the learning of the sages and the learning of the people. Scholar-officials thus led the mass Confucian community, and Zhai’s XYDS epitomizes the continuing endeavors of the time to unify the intellectual discourse of Confucian thought, as well as preaching the ethical covenant among local communities. It is precisely owing to every individual being equipped with the innate capacity for moral perfection that everyone is entitled to the exercise of cultivating sagehood. Operating under the presumption that lecturing on Confucian thought is identical to lecturing on the covenant, no disparity exists between Confucianism as a form of higher learning and as a teaching for the general populace. It can thus be inferred from Zhai’s philosophy that the mass Confucianism which had been thriving since the mid-Ming dynasty did not vanish with the demise of the dynasty. At the very least, it exerted a positive influence on the reconstruction of social order after the chaos of the early Qing dynasty. Following the reigns of the Kangxi and Yongzheng emperors, political fetters were imposed on the speech of scholar-officials and the promotion of sacred edicts was reduced to empty, formal announcements, marking the bifurcation and distancing of the intellectual pursuit of learning on the one hand and mass moral cultivation on the other. |