英文摘要 |
This study aims to discuss the relationship between senior high school students’learning disturbance and basic competencies, where teacher support and teachers’teaching performance in school-related factors and satisfaction with school are used as the mediators. The effects of learning disturbance, teacher support, teachers’teaching performance, and satisfaction with school on basic competencies are also reviewed in this study for the differences among upper secondary students, vocational students, junior college students, and further-study students. Total 21,594 samples of high school 11th graders and sophomore of junior colleges in the academic year 2016 are acquired from the Taiwan Upper Secondary Education Database as the research subjects. Structural Equation Model is applied to test the relationship among latent variables, and multi-group analysis is further utilized for testing the education type difference in the structural relationship. The research findings show that learning disturbance would indirectly affect basic competencies through teachers’teaching performance, teacher support, and satisfaction with school. Furthermore, learning disturbance would indirectly affect basic competencies through teachers’teaching performance and then through satisfaction with school. Teachers’teaching performance would also indirectly affect basic competencies through satisfaction with school. Among above indirect effects, teacher support appears the most significant mediation. The multi-group analysis further reveals that learning disturbance does not show remarkable effects on teacher support for vocational and junior college students. The rest upper secondary, vocational, junior college, or further-study students present notable prediction of learning disturbance, teacher support, teachers’teaching performance, and satisfaction with school on basic competencies. Moreover, the comparison of structural coefficients also reveals obviously higher structural coefficients of upper secondary students than vocational and further-study students, while no obvious difference appears on upper secondary and junior college students. |