英文摘要 |
The dichotomy between trade-based manipulation and information-based manipulation shall be subverted. As a result, the crime of manipulating securities market is to be reclassified, according to the different principles of imputation, into fraud-manipulation based on organizational jurisdiction and advantage-abuse based on institutional jurisdiction. The judgment on the issue whether behaviors could distort the mechanism in which both trading price and trading volume are formed, should go beyond the factual dimension, focusing on the question whether the objective attribution of manipulability is due to the creation of false signals with regard to trading price and volume which deceive investors' reasonable expectation of the market, or the failure to carry out positive obligations aimed at maintaining the free competition in the securities pricing process, namely restricting improperly the participation of other variables in the pricing process or exacerbating the asymmetry of market information. It is not justifiable to attribute the abnormal fluctuations in the securities market to a single person without special identities who uses non-false information to induce transactions. Only if the asymmetric information is created by subjects with dynamic information advantage who assume positive obligations, can the miscellaneous provision be applied because their behaviors, in terms of the advantage abuse, are comparable with the violation of positive obligations by those who have financial advantage, stockholding advantage or static information advantage. |