英文摘要 |
This article discusses from the perspective of ethnic politics, and finds that the unresolved ethnic turmoil can be an important factor that induces Myanmar's political dilemma. Myanmar is a multi-ethnic country. Historically, the Burmese and various ethnic minorities were in a state of competition. The divide and rule policy adopted during the British colonial period worsened their relationship, and the Rohingya issue can also be traced back to this period. At the beginning of Myanmar's independence in 1948, federalism was originally planned in the famous Panglong Agreement, allowing ethnic minorities to enjoy autonomy and even the right of secession. However, such a policy was not implemented after independence, which led to dissatisfaction among the minority groups, and in turn evolved into ethnic armed conflicts. This situation also catalyzed the rise of military rulers, and then they used it as excuses to stay in power for a long time. Unelected military rulers not only undermine democracy, but also hurt the economy due to their lack of expertise in governing the country. They are also reluctant to mend relations with minorities, and use the Rohingya people as scapegoats. This article argues that the quagmire of contemporary Myanmar politics is rooted in unresolved ethnic politics since its independence. It is suggested that returning to the Panglong spirit and having appropriate institutional design, such as federalism, may be a feasible way to solve Myanmar's political predicament. |