少年修復式司法操作模式之研究

A Study for Practice Model of Restorative Justice in Juvenile

修復式司法雖存在各種不同的觀點及不同模式，然其包容及人性化的特點，已被概念化為社會正義理論及人性尊嚴的實踐。由於它為受害者及罪犯提供了一種處理犯罪的正向積極手段，所以國際性組織一再鼓勵使用，許多國家也透過立法推展，但是，由於人們缺乏認識及司法人員的態度等問題，造成刑事案件運用數量上的不成比例。我國雖已推展十年，且已將「修復」入法，亦面臨同樣的問題。本文以少年事件之修復經驗，參考外國文獻，提出系統性操作模式，透過實證研究證明該模式之有效性，期喚起國人對於修復式司法的認識及信任，並增強司法人員對其信心，更重要的是，幫助少年健全自我成長，矯治其性格。本文之實證部分係以臺北地方法院依「試辦方案」轉介修復之少年事件為樣本，進行相關問卷及訪談。研究發現，案採衝突調解模式，整個流程在後續追蹤的問卷及訪談的資料顯示正向評價，因此建議對於少年事件之修復式司法可以採此模式進行。

There are multiple viewpoints and different process models of restorative justice. Its tolerance and humanization have been conceptualized as an implementation of social justice theory and human dignity. It provides a positive and active approach for the victims and the inmates to confront the crimes. Therefore, international organizations proactively encourage countries to use it, and many countries even have enforced this concept through legislation. Although implemented restorative justice has been for a decade and has been legislated already in our country, because of people's lack of understanding and the negative attitude of relative judicial personnel, its utilization toward criminal cases appears disproportionately.
This study attempts to propose a systematic practice model based on the restorative practice experience of juvenile criminal cases and prove the effectiveness of the practice model through empirical research. Hopefully, it can arouse people's understanding and trust in restorative justice, enhance the judicial personnel's confidence, more importantly, help the juvenile inmates comprehensively develop their self-growth and correct their character. This study's empirical evidence is based on juvenile incident referrals from Taipei District Court and conducts questionnaires and interviews. The study found that we adopted the conflict mediation model in the case and the follow-up data showed positive evaluation. It suggests that restorative justice can carry out this model for juvenile incidents.