英文摘要 |
Open data is all the rage now. The Republic of China (Taiwan) has promoted open data since 2012, and it has attained remarkable achievement so far. Currently, the open data legal system of Taiwan relies on the Openness of Government Information Act and administrative rules. Additionally, some acts and regulations have been subsumed under the open data legal system. National Development Council (NDC) drafted special law for open data before. Meanwhile, the open data legal system of European Union and the United States have undergone sweeping changes. This study research European and American open data legal systems. Moreover, this study discusses the challenges faced by the government of Taiwan about special law for open data and makes some recommendations.
This study analyzes European and American legal frameworks for open data in recent years. To cite an instance, OPEN Government Data Act, the Directive on the Open Data and the re-use of Public Sector Information (Directive (EU) 2019/1024) and Proposal for Regulation on European data governance are included in them. OPEN Government Data Act mandates that every covered agency shall designate a nonpolitical appointee employee in the agency as the Chief Data Officer (CDO) of the agency. Moreover, it creates a Chief Data Officer Council that each agency’s CDO should serve on the Council. Directive (EU) 2019/1024 puts emphasis on high-value datasets, the principle of “open by default” and the FAIR principles. In addition, it mandates that public sector bodies and public undertakings should provide their documents via suitable APIs. Furthermore, European and American open data legal system step to another stage that is data governance.
As mentioned above, this study recommends that the government of Taiwan should learn from advantages in the European and American open data legal system. The authors hope to refine the current open data legal system of Taiwan and promote relevant policies; moreover, steps to another stage that is data governance. |