行政活動編的編纂思路

Thoughts on Codification of Administrative Activity Part

行政活動法律規範進入行政法典並獨立成編，學術界達成的共識多於爭議。之所以使用行政活動命名該編，源于行政活動比核心概念行政行為更具涵蓋性，且不會削弱行政行為這一概念的地位，但該編不宜包括政府運營活動和部分內部行政活動。行政活動編的體系和結構安排，需要在妥善處理實體與程式統分、行政活動編與總則編在內容上的合理配置的前提下，以體系性、類型化和開放性為基本思路，形成行政規則制定分編、行政決策與規劃分編、典型行政執法行為分編、其他行政活動分編、行政程式和政府資訊公開分編共五分編。為推動行政活動的發展及其法治化，行政活動編應致力於推進行政活動的規範充分化、合作化和智慧化。

It is more consensus than controversy that legal rule concerning the administrative activity falls within the administrative code. The part titled administrative activity, not administrative action as the central concept of administrative law, originates from this concept possessing more coverage than administrative action and weakening the status of administrative action excessively, and excludes from government business activities and some of internal administrative activities. Premised on properly dealing with the relationships between substance and procedure and reasonably distributing content between this part and general provisions part, the administrative activity part should consist of five sub-parts: administrative rule-making, administrative policy-making and planning, typical administrative enforcement actions, other administrative activities, administrative procedure and freedom of government information, based on basic consideration of systemization, stereotype and compatibility. In order to push the development and legalization of administrative activities, the administrative activity part should be devoted to the adequacy, collaboration and intelligentialization of administrative activities.