英文摘要 |
The most crucial events in 2020 were undoubtedly the political and economic impacts of COVID-19 around the world. However, even in countries with similar political and economic conditions, there have been considerable variations in their epidemic prevention performance. Although there are many arguments that try to explain these variations, few empirical studies have been done to verify their relative explanatory power. Therefore, the goal of this study is to propose a systemic explanation to the variations in countries' epidemic prevention performance. Based on suggestions of both the literature and the experiences of selected representative countries, I argue that the key to understanding the variations lies in both “government effectiveness” and “political stability.” The degree of government effectiveness determines the speed of government response, quality of policy, efficiency of resource mobilization, and capability of policy implementation. The degree of political stability determines to what degree the political controversies negatively affect the formation and implementation of governments' epidemic control policies in democracies, and the extent of the capabilities and incentives that the governments have to devote to epidemic control in non-democracies. Both affect whether a government's effectiveness can translate to its epidemic prevention performance. Therefore, countries that have higher government effectiveness and political stability will have a better overall epidemic prevention performance and thus experience a lower confirmed case ratio. Empirical evidence from 162 countries around the world in the year 2020 supports my argument. |