英文摘要 |
This research focuses on the current status, effectiveness, dilemma and strategic actions of the Raman spectroscopy in the process of preliminary drug testing procedures in drug cases. This research uses qualitative research methods to conduct a semi-structured interview of individual through deliberate sampling, which contains a total of 10 administrative police, criminal police and forensic officers at the Chiayi City Police Bureau. The results of the study found that most of the drugs samples seized by the police were ketamine and amphetamines. In addition, the packaging styles of the coffee milk tea were diverse and the contents were mainly mixed with second and third class of drugs. The accuracy rate of the Raman optical spectrum analyzer is as high as 88%, therefore, it can be effectively used as evidence for the prosecutor's application for detention and the judge's decision to detain. Moreover, the use of this device for preliminary drug testing in the judicial process can reduce the number of misjudged people who are innocent and deter those who have escaped legal sanctions. Therefore, it is more able to uphold justice and maintain human rights. This study puts forward the following suggestions: (1) The accumulation and inheritance of experience under various conditions when operating the Raman optical spectrum analyzer is very important; (2) The Raman drug database can be increased and updated by sharing with relevant agencies, purchasing from manufacturers or through self-recommendation; (3) Under the budget of funding, the Police can purchase a Raman optical spectrum analyzer with a wavelength of 1064nm instead of a Raman spectrometer with a wavelength of 785nm to improve the fluorescence interference problems and to enhance the effectiveness of drug identification; (4) Factors such as drug purity or sampling errors may affect the results of Raman spectroscopy, so the identification of drug exhibits should still be subjected to professional identification agencies. |