| 中文摘要 |
"法律學說是連接立法與實踐的知識儲備和理論橋樑,也是推動司法與社會互動的知識引擎和理論動力。學者的學術觀點是法律學說的直接體現。在我國,存在司法判決引證法學學者觀點的現象。實證研究表明,268份樣本裁判文書中,有60位法學學者的觀點被引證307次。法律學說在裁判文書中發揮著解釋法律、論證說理及補充法律漏洞等作用,從而增強法官對法律事實性質或裁判結果判斷的合理性和合法性,提升裁判結果的可接受性。從應然層面來看,法律學說要為司法裁判提供可能的參考答案,為司法裁判提供有效的法律方法以及通過司法裁判總結科學的司法規律。實證研究與理論分析表明,雖然司法判決可以成為法律學說的“試驗田”,但是從主題任務和實踐立場兩分的角度看,法學與司法的適當分離是法治持續進步的階梯。" |
| 英文摘要 |
"Legal doctrine is the knowledge reserve and theoretical bridge linking legislation and practice, as well as the intellectual engine and theoretical impetus driving the interaction between judiciary and society. The academic views of scholars are the direct manifestation of legal doctrines. In China, there is a phenomenon of judicial decisions citing the views of legal scholars. Empirical research shows that the views of 60 legal scholars were cited 307 times in 268 sample adjudication documents. Legal doctrines play the role of explaining the law, arguing reasoning and supplementing legal loopholes in adjudication documents, thus enhancing the reasonableness and legitimacy of judges' judgments on the nature of legal facts or adjudication results, and enhancing the acceptability of adjudication results. On the contingent level, legal doctrine should provide possible reference answers for judicial decisions and provide effective legal methods for judicial decisions as well as summarize scientific judicial laws for judicial decisions. Empirical studies and theoretical analyses show that although judicial decisions can be a 'testing ground' for legal doctrine, the proper separation of academia and judiciary is a stepping stone for the continued progress of the rule of law from the perspective of both the thematic task and the practical position." |
本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
