英文摘要 |
"The borderless nature of the internet has enabled the development of the digital economy and revolutionary technical innovations, but it also brings lots of issues such as cybercrime. Technological evolutions and the digitalization of people’s lives constitute a tremendous challenge for law enforcement and legal authorities as they need to access evidence located on servers or cloud computing data centers that are often based abroad. Law enforcement agencies investigating multi-country crimes are often bound by the geographic limits of their jurisdictions and must rely on Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) to request and obtain the information they need. Due to the limits of existingMLATs, it is necessary to seek appropriate mechanisms to solve the problem of extraterritorial electronic data access. The Microsoft Ireland case presented the question whether a U.S. warrant issued pursuant to the 1986 Stored Communications Act (SCA), reach electronic data that are controlled by U.S.-based companies but stored on data centers located outside the United States. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, reversing the district court, held that theSCA did not require electronic communication service and remote computing service providers to produce email content stored outside the U.S. The passage of the CLOUD Act in 2018 brings an end to the four-year legal battle and the new law explains two parts: (i) U.S. access to data located outside the United States; and (ii) foreign Government access to data held by U.S. companies within the United States. The CLOUD Act represents an effort by the U.S. Government to set an new standard via domestic regulation, while the Act provides clarity as to the permissible reach of the U.S. Government, it raises issues of potential conflicts with the laws of other countries. Many details of how the Cloud Act will work in practice remain to be seen." |