英文摘要 |
"The Act on the Settlement of the Combination of Years of Service in Public Sector and Political Organizations has been enacted and implemented on May 10th, 2017. This Act addresses the so-called ''Combination of Years of Service in Public Sector and Political Organizations'' issue, which was caused by the preferential retirement treatments for the retired public servants who served as the KMT officials at the same time during the authoritarian period under martial law. Based on the Act, the relevant administrative agencies have processed to recover the excess amount of pensions falsely acquired by the said retired public servants; meanwhile, several of the requested parties filed the suits against the reclamations. Therefore, the Administrative Court have made numerous judicial decisions about the Act in recent years. However, by reviewing the said judicial decisions, this article finds that the implementation of the Act is contradictory to its legislative purpose. This contradiction even caused the plight for the competent authority to reclaim the excessive pension payouts by litigation. This article will propose some suggestions to ease the contradiction by examining and analyzing the legislative history of the Act on the Settlement of the Combination of Years of Service in Public Sector and Political Organizations, the administrative conduct based on the Act, and the relevant judicial decisions." |