英文摘要 |
"The study of everyday life has emerged as a burgeoning academic field in the past two decades. I consider this subject as part and parcel of new social history that is based on the everyday lives of ordinary people. The recognition of the history of everyday life by academic historians is linked to the process of democratization. It reflects the deepest and most neglected aspects of people in a nation and region. It can therefore be regarded as the foundation of a nation. Thus, the study of everyday life requires a holistic viewpoint to avoid triviality and to construct a comprehensive picture based on the organic linkages in real life. These two points are the main methodology of new social history proposed thirty years ago. This article further advance one key concept that has yet to be fully elaborated when we first advocated new social history. The commonsense of going beneath the surface is not self-evident. It requires in-depth reading of classics, effective methodology, and sober wisdom to put it into practice. Historians need to understand their research subjects and use their instinct to achieve insight in addition to empirical study of objects and archives. Only then can we conduct meaningful research that vividly combines both the manifest and latent aspects of historical reconstruction. This is a great task for all the domains of historiography and cannot be summed up in a few words. The study of everyday life can be seen as a laboratory for innovative historical research." |