英文摘要 |
"Purpose: This study explores the effects of commitment subjects on employee job satisfaction and job performance. In addition, the study examines the moderating effects of loyalty to supervisors on the relationship between organizational commitment and job satisfaction as well as organizational commitment and job performance. Design/methodology/approach: The top 1,000 enterprises were selected for this study. Each enterprise received four questionnaires, two of which were employee questionnaires (yellow and blue). The questionnaires were distributed by the head of human resources department to an employee who had a good relationship (yellow questionnaires) and an employee who had a bad relationship (blue questionnaires). Of the 113 questionnaires collected, 107 were valid. Findings: The explanatory power of organizational commitment on job satisfaction was more significant than that of loyalty to supervisors. Furthermore, loyalty to supervisors and organizational commitment significantly positively influenced job performance. The explanatory power of organizational commitment on job performance was more significant than that of loyalty to supervisors. Finally, the results revealed that loyalty to supervisors has a significant moderating effect on the relationship among organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and job performance. Originality/value: This study makes the following contributions. First, this paper discusses the influence of loyalty to supervisor and organizational commitment on employee behavior and determines which one has a greater influence on employee behavior. Second, through the leadership and subordinate exchange theory, a practical management skill can help understand whether the internal group and the external group can adjust the influence of organizational commitment on employee behavior and performance." |