論受讓人因指示交付而善意取得動產所有權

The Transferee in Good Faith Acquire a Personal Property via Assignment of Claim for Possession

無權處分人以指示交付之方式踐行交付之要件時，是否能生善意取得之效力，我國法雖有「讓與返還請求權即能善意取得說」、「修正之讓與返還請求權即能善意取得說」與「受現實交付始能善意取得說」，但本文認為宜採「區分說」，亦即應區分無處分權之讓與人是否係動產之間接占有人，而分別定受讓人善意取得動產所有權之要件。詳言之，倘讓與人為動產之間接占有人，僅需其讓與返還請求權與善意之受讓人，受讓人即能善意取得動產所有權，但若讓與人並非動產之間接占有人，則以受讓人已自第三人取得動產之占有，且於取得占有之時仍屬善意者為限，始能善意取得動產所有權。

Whether the situation that a transferor without title of disposition transfers the property via assignment of claim for possession apply to good faith acquisition, in Taiwan, there are three opinions related to above dispute. One is that ''transfer of the claim for restitution shall apply to good faith acquisition'', another is that ''adjustment of the transfer of the claim for restitution shall apply to good faith acquisition'', and the other is that ''only receives delivery could apply to good faith acquisition''. However, this paper adopts the opinion that ''distinguish situations''. This opinion means that the elements of the transferee in good faith acquire personal property depend on transferor without title is indirect possessor or not. In other words, if the transferor is indirect possessor, the transferee in good faith could acquire personal property when transferor transfers the claim for restitution to the transferee. However, if the transferor is not indirect possessor, only when the transferee has acquired possession from the third party and still be in good faith shall transferee acquire personal property.