英文摘要 |
Among all available recognized historical data, most of the researches ofinto theTaiwanese indigenous peoples’ houses areis based on the information establishedresearch begun by Chijiiwa instarting from 1936, which has since influenced many scholars to come, including Fujisima Gaijirou and Tanaka Daisaku, who adopted Chijiiwa’s documentation into their publishing ofpublications on Taiwanese indigenous architecture. However, Fujisima, havingwho conducted numerous studies of folk houses in Japan, actually set upestablished thea frameworks of thefor classifying the plan and structural systems of Taiwanese indigenous houses’ graphic and structural systems waylong before Chijiiwa did. It wasn’t until 1962, more than a decade after the WWII, didthat Chijiiwa proposed these classification systems when presenting his PhD thesis in Kyushu University. Chijiiwa studied in Nagoya iIndustrial sSchool, which is known for focusing on practical operations. Even though he had accumulated immense information from his investigation before WWII took place, he didn’t accomplishestablish his the classification structure until, much later, after the end of WWII. At the end of WWII, Fujisima Gaijirou put forward a series of his theses based on Chijiiwa’s fieldwork findings before Chijiiwa himself did. Therefore, when Chijiiwa presented his PhD degree thesis in 1962, many of the points he brought aboutdiscussed were actually influenced by the propositions founded by Fujisima and contemporary debate in many scholars in the architecture sphere. The frameworks created by Chijiiwa were originally aimed inat providing a solution to the disputes ofin the Japanese field of architecture history. Nevertheless, Chijiiwa’s first-hand comprehensive information from his fieldwork still serves as a fundamental guideline when it comes toit comes to restoring folk houses or re-establishing the classification structure structure systems of Taiwanese indigenous architecture. |