租賃住宅市場發展及管理條例適用問題之初探－以公證人審查為視角

The Perspective of a Notary Verifying Power:A Primary Discussion about the Application Problemof Rental Housing Market Development and Regulation Act.

為維護人民居住權，健全租賃住宅市場，保障租賃當事人權益，民國一○六年十一月二十八日，立法院三讀通過「租賃住宅市場發展及管理條例」（下稱本條例）。政府積極以專法形式介入住宅租賃市場之創舉，對於廣大租屋民眾與出租人權益影響重大，而本條例與既有之土地法、消保法、民法間優劣之適用順序，著實使公證人於防患未然之契約審查時即遭遇困惑。本文試圖探討公證人經常辦理之租約公證業務，坊間常見之租賃契約條款，於本條例施行後，得否仍得由當事人基於契約自由約定或因與本條例相抵觸而為無效或當事人未約定，本條例當然成為契約之內容；於契約自由與契約正義間求取適用之平衡。作者從本條例適用順序、適用客體、與其他法律間之協調或扞格等面向，期望能自公證人審查權之視角，釐清相關爭議。

In order to safeguard the people’s right of residence, improve the rental housing market, and protect the rights and interests of lease parties, on November 28, 2017, the Legislative Yuan passed the “Regulations on the Development and Management of the Rental Housing Market” (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations). The government’s initiative to actively intervene in the residential leasing market in the form of a speicial law has a significant impact on the rights and interests of the vast number of lessors and lessees. The order of application of this regulation and the existing land law, consumer protection law, and civil law really makes notary public encountered confusion in the contract verify and notarization. This article attempts to discuss the notarization of lease contracts which frequently handled by notaries, and common lease terms. After the regulation is implemented, whether the parties can freely agree on the contract or become invalid due to conflicts with the regulation, or not agreed by the parties, regulations certainly become the content of the contract. A balance of application is between contract freedom and contract justice. The author hopes to clarify the relevant disputes from the perspective of the notary’s verifying power. From the aspects of the order of application of the regulations, the object of application, coordination or conflict with other laws.