哲學思辨、自然的辯證及道德實踐的動力

Philosophical Speculation, Natural Dialectic and the Motivation of Moral Practice

在當代儒學界，關於朱陸異同的問題如何解決與朱子的思想的本質如何規定，仍然是爭論不已的問題。本文作者近年對於朱子的哲學理論，給出一些個人的想法，對牟宗三先生的朱子學詮釋，也提出了反省，引發許多有關的討論，李瑞全教授最近也提出一篇長文，對本人看法提出不同的意見，本文就李教授的論文的大意，從哲學思辨、自然的辯證及道德實踐的動力三方面來作回應。

In the contemporary Confucian academic circle, how to understand the similarities and differences between the thoughts of Zhu Zi and those of Lu Xiangshan and how to define the nature of Zhu Zi's thoughts remain controversial. In recent years, I have given some personal thoughts on Zhu Zi's philosophy and has reflected on Mr. Mou Zongsan's interpretation of Zhu Zi, which has sparked many discussions. Professor Lee Shui Chuen has also recently published an article, suggesting views that are different from mine. This article responds to some of his arguments from three aspects: philosophical speculation, natural dialectics, and the motivation of moral practice.