月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
黨產研究 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
轉型正義作為法治國的憲法價值:司法院大法官釋字第793號解釋分析
並列篇名
On Transitional Justice as a Constitutional Value: An Analysis on the Interpretation No. 793 of the Taiwanese Judicial Yuan
作者 蘇慧婕
中文摘要
"釋字第793號解釋首次明確承認了「轉型正義」乃是憲法上「特別重要之公共利益」。從30年轉型正義之路的角度來看,深入理解釋字第793號解釋提出何種論證,便同時具有憲法和轉型正義的理論與實務價值。本文從而將聚焦於「釋字第793號解釋承認轉型正義作為法治國價值之論證構成的憲政影響」。 綜覽解釋全文,可以發現本號解釋針對政黨財產權限制,採取了完整且環環相扣的規範違憲審查架構,如同基本權審查的範本。但必須強調的是,釋字第793號解釋不管是在尋繹黨產條例的立法目的或是權衡衝突法益,其時間面向都限定在「轉型後」:黨產條例是因為追求「未來的政黨公平競爭」而具有目的正當性,政黨財產權和機會平等的保障內涵也都是在「轉型後民主國家」的框架下認知,並以此為基準進行衡量。在轉型正義的脈絡中,這種單向的時間性有其侷限和風險。一方面,指向於「轉型後制度影響」的論證,無法應用在個人行為責任事後追究和個人權利損害事後填補的案例類型。另一方面,如果把「指向未來」的論證理解成忽視甚至排除「過去時間向度」的考量,就可能悖離了形式合法與實質正義衝突、以一貫的實質正義標準(向過去)重新評價形式合法行為並藉此(向未來)踐行憲政價值承諾的轉型正義思維。"
英文摘要
Since the Interpretation No. 793 of the Taiwanese Judicial Yuan, for the first time in the history, acknowledged transitional justice to be an “especially significant public interest”, it is of high value to analyze this Interpretation. In this light, this essay aims to clarify possible influences of the decision of Grand Justices to recognize transitional justice as an essential part of rule of law. While the Interpretation No. 793 scrutinized relevant restrictions on party assets under a comprehensive framework of judicial review, it is worth noting that the Taiwanese Constitutional Court legitimized the Act Governing the Settlement of Ill-gotten Properties by Political Parties and Their Affiliate Organizations (the Act of Ill-gotten Properties) exclusively on the basis of the negative influences of ill-gotten properties on the future regime. More specifically, the Act of Ill-gotten Properties was justified by its purpose of preventing unfair competition between political parties and its balance between property right and equal opportunities in a transited, free and democratic system. However, such a one-dimensional perspective would backfire on transitional justice, because it not only overlooks cases regarding backward compensation and persecution, but dismisses the essence of transitional justice, that is, re-evaluation of formal legality on the basis of consistent substantial legitimacy.
起訖頁 161-193
關鍵詞 轉型正義法治國原則不當黨產憲法保留信賴保護法律不溯及既往transitional justicerule of lawill-gotten party assetsconstitutional reservationprotection of legitimate expectationthe principle of non-retroactivity
刊名 黨產研究  
期數 202106 (6期)
出版單位 不當黨產處理委員會
該期刊-上一篇 論接收日產成黨產過程中的轉帳撥用問題
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄