英文摘要 |
Since the Interpretation No. 793 of the Taiwanese Judicial Yuan, for the first time in the history, acknowledged transitional justice to be an “especially significant public interest”, it is of high value to analyze this Interpretation. In this light, this essay aims to clarify possible influences of the decision of Grand Justices to recognize transitional justice as an essential part of rule of law. While the Interpretation No. 793 scrutinized relevant restrictions on party assets under a comprehensive framework of judicial review, it is worth noting that the Taiwanese Constitutional Court legitimized the Act Governing the Settlement of Ill-gotten Properties by Political Parties and Their Affiliate Organizations (the Act of Ill-gotten Properties) exclusively on the basis of the negative influences of ill-gotten properties on the future regime. More specifically, the Act of Ill-gotten Properties was justified by its purpose of preventing unfair competition between political parties and its balance between property right and equal opportunities in a transited, free and democratic system. However, such a one-dimensional perspective would backfire on transitional justice, because it not only overlooks cases regarding backward compensation and persecution, but dismisses the essence of transitional justice, that is, re-evaluation of formal legality on the basis of consistent substantial legitimacy. |