英文摘要 |
The Supreme Court criminal verdict No.2949(2018)revealed the general principles of criminal jurisprudence. The original trial's determination of the number of criminal acts, the facts of the crime and the reasons for adjudication must be consistent. Otherwise, it is a judgment that violates the law. The appeal judgment was revoked, and the amount of input tax is falsely reported the supporting documents by taxpayer in violation of Article 41 of the Tax Collection Act. A taxpayer who evades tax payment by fraud or other unrighteous means. Article 71 of the Business Entity Accounting Act, Knowingly using untrue information to prepare accounting documents or entering false information in account books, the criminal elements of the two are not consistent, and the number of criminal acts is one act or several acts, based on one act The violation of the law of numbers envisages concurrence, choosing a criminal policy that emphasizes heavy punishment, combining behaviors and punishing the punishment that should be executed regularly. The number of behaviors affects the criminal punishment of the perpetrators. This article considers that it is advisable to adopt the number of District court acts as one. One year and two months of scientific imprisonment, compared with the number of acts of Appeal court, two years of scientific imprisonment, more consistent with Offenses of knowingly using untrue information to prepare accounting documents or entering false information in account books and Offenses of tax evasion by fraud or other unrighteous means. |