英文摘要 |
Our investigation at the Matsu Islands draws perspectives from maritime cultural landscape that highlights the cultural networks are intertwined through navigation routes, sea ports, and in particular the littoral zones where marine and terrestrial activities meet. Presently, over two thousand archaeological sites have been recorded covering almost the entire island of Taiwan, but archaeological survey on the coastline is as yet underdeveloped. Word-wide, investigations of coastal sites are receiving increasing attentions as we face the impacts of global warming and the resulting rising sea levels which will have particular impacts on waterfront sites. Furthermore, this approach can uncover evidence of potential underwater cultural resources at shorelines. Based on a literature search and our first-hand fieldwork data on Matsu islands, this article aims to explore the issues of cultural landscape changes and ancient navigation networks. Chinese literature has illustrated that ancient seafaring relied heavily on significant maritime landmarks and scenes, explaining how the pivotal location of the Matsu islands at the mouth of Min River could account for their importance to military considerations and maritime trade since the Song Dynasty. Our archaeological surveys of beaches throughout the six main islands shows that substantial deposition of Chinese porcelain occurred since the 9th to 10th century AD. Taken together, our data from historical archives and materials from terrestrial archaeological sites contribute to a portrait of longterm activities of Han Chinese on the Matsu islands. Our analysis further reveals an abrupt peak of artifacts dated between the 12th and 14th centuries, which merits particular discussion. A comparative analysis reveals that the identical combination of types of ceramics can link archaeological discoveries on Fuzho in China and Matsu with archaeological sites on the northern shores of Taiwan and Ryukyu, which suggests an early Sino-Japan trade route rarely mentioned in historical documents of the time. We argue that the nature of this early, unrecorded, maritime trade deviates substantially from the official trade between China and Japan that prevailed in next several centuries. |