英文摘要 |
Bone inscriptions created thousands of years ago remain readable to modern researchers and enable them to study ancient cultures. Yet it may not be easy to open a file created by Wordstar^(TM) just two decades ago. Users of mobile phones in different makers and models can communicate each other without difficulties. Yet we insist, with unchallengeable obsession, on which everybody should use the same newest version of Microsoft Office^(TM) in order to exchange documents. Are there something missing in our ICT procurement policies to ensure sustainable development? What high prices are businesses and organizations paying when CIOs are unaware of cost of exit? This paper argues, from a sustainable development perspective, that government agencies should, in the minimum, submit any procured and/or newly created software to compatibility test using FLOSS (Free/Libre/Open Source Software) in order to make sure that the new software complies with open standards. If criteria such as security - especially from either national security or business trade secret perspective - and environmental protection are concerned, then certainly FLOSS should be the first priority in any procurement or newly commissioned project. |