英文摘要 |
The intrinsic aim of palliative care, as part of health care, is the promotion of a medical good related to physical or mental illness. This professional treatment must be humane and show full appreciation of the disease or disorder, the suffering and treatment of the particular patient, and the place of treatment in the patients' conception of his total good. The ethical concepts introduced are integral to the pursuit of these aims and the controlling virtue is that of practical wisdom. Only the exercise of practical wisdom can ensure that the caregiver's conception of the patient's medical good may just be left in peace. The moral quality of a clinical decision is dependent on the process of the decision and not only on the outcome. We are also accountable and responsible for the way our decisions may reach. In palliative care, outcomes are multifactorial and unpredicatable. Therefore we are usually only partially responsible in a causal sense for the outcome, and are blameworthy or praiseworthy in respect to the outcome only to the extent that our decision of itself influenced the outcome. The rightness or wrongness of life-prolonging and life-sustaining treatments in palliative care depends on the particular clinical circumstances in which they are considered. Treatment options are selected by caregivers on the basis of the benefits to burdens/risks calculus. They are then offered to autonomous patients, or considered by caregivers and relatives on behalf of non-autonomous patients. Since the outcome of treatment is always uncertain because of the unpredictability of the disease course and the uncertainties of the benefits to burdens/risks calculus, treatments should be reviewed regularly and caregivers should always remain willing to modify treatment accordingly. Caregivers should not intend to cause overall harm to patients in the interests of the relatives, but it is sometimes morally justifiable to compromise the good of one patient in the interests of others. |