“金融安全”的司法表達

The Judicial Expression of ''Financial Security''

“金融安全”雖非嚴格意義上的法律概念，但在我國法院的司法文件和司法裁判文書中一直被廣泛使用，其原因在于：其一，法院需要確認自身作為國家整體政治（政權）架構中的重要組成部分；其二，法院正當化自由裁量權的行使；其三，為創制金融法律規則提供外部條件。由此，“金融安全”的話語表述成為了現實中的司法“潤滑劑”，同時也一定程度上展示了我國金融司法的主要運行特徵：首先，“金融安全”話語在某些場景中有可能弱化司法自由裁量權的外部約束；其次，除了涉及政策性的不良金融債權處置案件之外，“金融安全”話語現實中並不構成司法領域中“所有制歧視”的基礎；最後，“金融安全”話語持續扮演著公共政策向司法政策轉化過程中“橋梁”的角色，但也埋下了以司法穩定性為代價的隱憂。

Although ''financial security'' is not a legal concept in the strict sense, it has been widely used in judicial documents and judicial adjudications of Chinese courts. The reasons are as follows: First, the courts need to confirm that they are in the overall political (power) structure of the country. Secondly, the court justifies the exercise of discretion; thirdly, it provides external conditions for creating financial legal rules. As a result, the discourse expression of ''financial security'' has become a judicial ''lubricant'', and it has also demonstrated the main characteristics of China's financial judiciary to a certain extent. First, the ''financial security'' discourse in some scenarios may weaken the external constraints on judicial discretion; secondly, except for cases involving the disposition of non-performing financial claims, the discourse of ''financial security'' does not actually constitute the basis of ''discrimination of ownership'' throughout the judiciary; finally, ''financial security'' discourse continues to play the role of ''bridge'' in the transition from public policy to judicial policy, but it also lays hidden concerns at the expense of judicial stability.